This is a letter I sent to President Obama asking him to couple his stem cell bill with a ban on genetic patenting.

Mr. President:   I applaud you for signing a bill that allows scientists to perform the needed research to save lives.  But now you must take the next, far more difficult, step: you must outlaw gene patenting or the bill you have signed today will be our nightmare tomorrow.   

Today, universities and major private corporations have partnered to patent life itself.  These conglomeration are halting research, preventing medical testing and keeping vital information from you and your wife. 

In your Audacity of Hope you speak of how you felt when your little girl was ill.  The truth is that she might well have had a needless crisis; she might have been in an emergency room because some corporation, somewhere patented a more effective treatment and/or test that did not require hospitalization.  Of course I am just guessing about that. 

But these are well-documented facts:   A simple test for breast cancer which should cost $1,000 costs over $3,000 and the owner of Hepatitis C (the Chiron Corporation) is paid millions annually by people who simply want to study it.  (That incidentally is also why it is so prohibitively expensive to treat Hepatitis C–and why virtually not a single person who is middle- or low-income is treated for this deadly and infectious disease.)  If you or your loved ones get Alzheimer’s it will be virtually impossible for you to get treatment because Athena Diagnostics has patented Alzheimer’s.    But of course you are the President of the United States.  So you might manage to get treament for yourself and your family.  And that treatment might kill you. 

This is because certain medications and certain treatments work only with certain people.  But the drug companies who own the disease of Alzheimer’s will not tell us (not even if you happen to be the President of the United States) whether the treatment that has been shown to be effective for Alzheimer’s in some people will work for you–or whether it will kill you.  Disclosing such information will jeopardize their bottom line.  They would rather we die.  Literally.  

A few years ago, during the outbreak of the SARS disease the three companies that held patents to the three strands of SARS would not allow their scientists to collaborate on a treatment because doing so might have jeopardized their bottom lines.  Thousands died needlessly and millions were crippled for life but the pharmaceutical companies in question are doing better than the troubled banks.  

And why should these companies own a disease in the first place?  They didn’t invent it.  But they do–in fact, they own not only many of the most common diseases but 20% of our bodies.  If anything goes wrong with that 20% we need the pharmaceutical companies’ permission to get treatment for it. That percentage will grow (and rapidly) now that pharmaceutical companies can play with stem cells.  

So, Mr. President I applaud you for giving so many people hope with the stem cell legislation.  But now comes the hard part: you must outlaw gene patenting or the hope you have given today will be the nightmare of tomorrow.

17
Liked it
Comments (18)
  • Dee Gold on Mar 16, 2009

    the message is clear here.

  • Debra Mann on Mar 16, 2009

    Well written with clear and precise wording. Great letter and article, Inna.

  • Mr Ghaz on Mar 16, 2009

    Great work! That was well-written piece. Well done! all the best 2 U

  • CHAN LEE PENG on Mar 16, 2009

    You’ve brought up an important issue here. I agree that Obama must outlaw gene patenting or there’ll become the nightmare for a large group of people!!!

  • Karen Gross on Mar 16, 2009

    Once again, I am so grateful for living in Canada. Our medicare system is far from perfect, and sometimes we have to wait awhile to see a specialist or get a test done. But here, the family doctor has a bit more clout. If you can convince your GP that you need a test done, he has the authority to put you on the waiting list.
    Your system seems so complex. From what I understand, it is an HMO who decides what treatment you qualify for, and people who can afford to pay the bill themselves get the best treatment.
    A specialist once told me that any Canadian can go to the Mayo Clinic – if there is something wrong, they will find it. Just swipe your credit card at the front desk.

  • Karen Gross on Mar 16, 2009

    I just scrolled back to the top of your article, and realised that I’ve been ranting off topic. You were discussing medical ethics, gene research, and how medical science seems to be always one step ahead of where most people draw the line eventually, once people get used to an idea and it becomes socially acceptable, the researchers erase that line and start a new one.It’s always a very slippery slice.
    The research and development team should not be allowed to patent something that God made – which is why they won’t spend money on herbal remedies – there is no profit if they can’t patent it.

  • Glynis Smy on Mar 16, 2009

    Good letter, let’s hope he gets to read it!

  • Inna Tysoe on Mar 16, 2009

    Thank you everyone for all your comments.

    “The research and development team should not be allowed to patent something that God made “

    Karen–

    I agree. And, since most (if not all) of these companies are international, this impacts you too I’m afraid. What’s more, if we ban genetic patenting here but it remains legal in Canada, all the pharma. companies will just “re-register” as Canadian companies. It’s remarkably simple to do; open an office, hire a few people and boom you’re now a “Canadian” company.

    Best,

    Inna

  • papaleng on Mar 16, 2009

    a well-written and the message is so clear.

  • Jo Oliver on Mar 16, 2009

    This is a hard one for me because I have a child that could benefit from stem cell research.

    I agree with many of your points, and definitely agree that cloning of any kind should be outlawed. I am just not sure that I agree with your applaud to Obama advancing funding stem cell research. It is a very slippery slope to create life for the sole purpose of destroying it….whether that be to do anything- stem cell, cloning, etc.. There are enough embryos from IVF to perform embryonic stem cell research without creating more embryos to be destroyed. Plus, adult skin cells are becoming a viable option too. So, I am not jumping up and down at his lift of the Bush regs.

  • Melody Arcamo Lagrimas on Mar 17, 2009

    A clear message on a very controversial issue…welcome back, inna.

  • lindalulu on Mar 17, 2009

    Really nice letter, I hope he appreciates your time!

  • Phil Newton on Mar 17, 2009

    Let’s hope this is the first of many such letters. GREAT.

  • Ruby Hawk on Mar 17, 2009

    I understand where you are coming from. Our lives are literly in the hands of the parmaceutical companies who patent the medicine. I hope this will seem important enough for someone to take notice.

  • Inna Tysoe on Mar 17, 2009

    Jo Oliver–

    I guess having seen a few stem cells during my (quickly aborted) parent-induced attempt to become a doctor, I am not terribly bothered by stem cell research itself. Stem cells are.. cells. If someone didn’t tell you they were human cells, you would never know it. They’re these shapeless little things that fit most comfortably indeed in a petri dish.

    So that’s not the part that bothers me.

    And if stem cell research can help people then I am 100% OK with it. But it won’t help people–not anywhere in the world if don’t take the pharmaceutical companies out of the equation.

    Regards,

    Inna

  • Yovita Siswati on Mar 18, 2009

    You touch a very sensitive issues. Very well written.

  • Lucas Dié on Mar 20, 2009

    Well written, but do politicians know how to read?

  • Inna Tysoe on Mar 21, 2009

    “Well written, but do politicians know how to read?”

    Well, Lucas in 2007 Xavier Becerra, a Democrat of California, and Dave Weldon, a Republican of Florida, sponsored the Genomic Research and Accessibility Act, to ban the practice of patenting genes found in nature. It died in committee (i.e, for lack of interest.)

    So if enough people the world over (because this impacts everyone in the globe) makes enough fuss they may be persuaded to learn.

    Regards,

    Inna

Leave a Comment

Hi there!

Hello! Welcome to Authspot, the spot for creative writing.
Read some stories and poems, and be sure to subscribe to our feed!

Find the Spot