Can a machine (or simply software) feel. I plan … Well, not so much love, I understand that it is difficult, but banal emotions, feelings, etc.
Whether it is implemented with the help of what the algorithm, or scripts, but I lean that it (the machine or program) can feel! Because feelings are caused by human afford something else. Let people do you assess his appearance, if you like, then you get sympathy. Further comment on his feelings for you, etc.

Can. What feelings? Roughly, a set of chemical reactions, estimated by the brain. By entering into the body or another chemical. substances can make a person feel any emotion. Why not implement the software?

However, the machine is almost no mistakes. A man in the evaluation makes a lot of them, thereby producing enzymes inappropriate ….

All human life is dictated by emotions and instincts: survival, reproduction, production of food and more comfortable environment. What, ultimately, emotions? This electrical impulses. E-consciousness is able to fully control the electrical impulses, causing the desired emotion (there is a version that consciousness does not want to control it – launch retro program my responsive as the “old” man).
The speed of nerve signal is only 30 m / s, against the almost light speed – 300,000 km / s on inorganic carriers of consciousness. Agree – a significant advantage.
At this stage of evolution, our emotions are caused by the action neyoropeptidov (they already know about 11 000).
In something wrong those who believe that consciousness on other media will not feel human emotions. It will test their emotions, according to the opportunities that will have. Most likely, it would be the state that we are not able now to understand.

All the same, I think that the program can feel.
The program works much more effective than the human brain, and under the influence of changes in the external, will reproduce itself and evolve in their capabilities, but only when artificial intelligence will stand above the level of the program.

Guys, do not forget that the emotions – much more primitive system compared with the mind, which was formed more in the higher reptiles millions of years ago on the basis of analysis of odors. Recreating them is much simpler than this AI. The hardest hit with a sense of humor – the most intellectual of the emotions which animals just can not have. Everything else – no problems. People tend to compare with the mysterious emotions solely because of their motivational effects: Meanwhile, the same states or their equivalents (fear, aggression, joy, etc.) – no more than a comprehensive assessment of the situation at the time as a reasonable mind details the situation to Guys, do not forget that emotions – far more primitive system compared with the mind that has emerged yet in the higher reptiles millions of years ago on the basis of analysis of odors. Recreating them is much simpler than this AI. The hardest hit with a sense of humor – the most intellectual of the emotions which animals just can not have. Everything else – no problems. People tend to compare with the mysterious emotions solely because of their motivational effects: Meanwhile, the same states or their equivalents (fear, aggression, joy, etc.) – no more than a comprehensive assessment of the situation at the time as a reasonable mind details the situation to an arbitrary level of detail.

There is an assumption that the car will not survive, having emotions and feelings. Because is different, one may say “body”, then, perhaps, a sense to be different? Otherwise, the machine can succumb to madness? Or a sense of motivating loneliness (fairly simple feeling of?) To commit suicide? The probability of such mistakes, no one seems to rule out or they do not usually think?