An expert essay regarding the type of person who is capable of murder.

            When the issue of “nature versus nurture” comes into play, there are people who answer, resoundingly, with “nature” and people who answer, equally, with “nurture”. Those people aren’t Jeffrey Kluger or Evan Sycamnias, both of whom wrote astoundingly thorough and influential essays exploring the psychology of serial killers through the lens of “nature versus nurture”. What they found, and I’ll gladly agree with and add to, is that a serial killer’s nature is found securely on the divider between nature and nurture. The predictors start early in a serial murderer’s life, showing signs of sociopathic behavior as early as elementary school. Their actions and behaviors, though, aren’t lone predictors. Take into account family and social interaction, as well as certain cranial and emotional “deformities” which can show the way a killer’s brain functions. So, given that information, and the blurred line between nature and nurture, can we accurately predict who will kill and who will not?

            Some may say yes.

            In Sycamnias’ essay Evaluating the Psychological Profile of a Serial Killer, he alludes to the importance of monitoring a child’s behavior for signs of future-killer activity. “To discover what makes a serial killer function,” explains Sycamnias, “it is necessary to look back into their past, particularly their adolescent life.”  A future serial murderer may exhibit signs of aggression, not toward peers or even humans, but mostly toward animals. The mutilation of, or extreme cruelty toward, animals which are considerably smaller than the child is a marquee sign of a future murderer. The inability to interact socially may be a warning sign as well. It’s important to observe a child’s behavior in a social setting, as in at a playground or in a school environment. Being very removed and aggressively separating oneself are both signs that murderers typically showed in childhood, as well as excessive daydreaming and compulsive and public masturbation. Finally, the indicative lack of love between a child and his parents is key. Very infrequently have serial killers come from loving, warm homes.

1
Liked it
Comments (2)
  • ladybaby on May 10, 2009

    This is an interesting over view. It is frightening that so many serial killers are on the loose at any one time. I read that it was 70 in this country.We are a society so preoccupied with THINGS and working our butts off to get them, that we fail to consider what is happening to our children. Then we pay the price when they turn on us.

  • Taylor G. Gould on May 10, 2009

    Absolutely–
    thanks very much ladybaby. For reading, and for responding.

    Society takes a severe “backseat” to the controlling of serial murderers. By monitoring and making sure children are in safe situations as children, we can take a more “nip it in the bud” approach.

Leave a Comment

Hi there!

Hello! Welcome to Authspot, the spot for creative writing.
Read some stories and poems, and be sure to subscribe to our feed!

Find the Spot

Loading