She is wondering whether there is such a thing as masculine texts and feminine texts and masculine techniques for writing and feminine techniques and strategies for writing.

Are writers just writers?

She is a student of civilizations and likes to ponder these types of questions. She likes to study the customs and folkways of peoples, and she likes to study on the level of civilizations themselves. What makes some civilizations different from others?

She is a student of the history of civilizations. She is a student of the psychology of civilizations. She is a student of the evolution of civilizations. She is a student of the sacred, as manifested in civilizations.

She does not pretend to be an expert on civilizations. She is a student of civilizations. All civilizations have their masters, those who have mastered that civilization, or those who come closest to the mastery of their civilization.

As for civilizatons and gender?

She thinks that gender equality is necessary, but yet there must be a difference. Certainly there seems to be a different in the texts. Female language and masculine language. Female perspective and masculine perspective. Does the difference mean there is no equality? She knows that there is a different in viewpoint.

She thinks that patriarchy is as necessary as matriarchy. The yin and yang, the different wisdom systems. Sometimes these different wisdom systems intermingle.

But there are corruptions of both wisdom systems. There are excesses and abuses of both. All wisdom systems appear to have their corruptions.

Wisdom systems can be material, intellectual, political, spiritual. Wisdom systems are created to understand and deal with the material world, the intellectual world, the political world, and the spiritual world. Human beings try to understand all of these worlds and create wisdom systems to understand them. Sometimes these wisdom systems, as in the sacred texts, are said to originate with the divine world.

As for the masculine-feminine thesis?

She has heard of the phrase postfeminism. Early feminism she supposes thinks that everything that women think is correct. This is no more correct than everything that men think or propose is correct.

Yin and yang is correct, both working together and figuring out who is correct. Perhaps sometimes the yin is correct and sometimes the yang is correct. Perhaps sometimes both are correct. Perhaps sometimes neither are correct.

She supposes that sometimes yin defers to yang, sometimes yang to yin, and vice versa. She supposes and she supposes.

She supposes that she is a postfeminist, whatever that means.

Perhaps that is her style. She supposes that the femininization of society is just as corrupt as the masculinization of society. That balance is necessary. Yin and yang.

And, or, both can be just as virtuous?

Both perspectives are necessary.

She reads the masculine texts and the reassertion of the masculine in texts. She reads the feminine texts and the reassertion of the feminine in texts.

She reads the masculine sacred texts. She hunts for sacred feminine texts.

She assumes that female rulers have been no less abusive than masculine. She must study the history. The honorable masculine rulers. The honorable feminine rules.

She is trying to find a subject for study. She thinks of yin and yang. She thinks of balance.

Perhaps the ancients are always correct. We return to balance. We return to yin and yang.

Yin asserts itself. Yang reasserts itself. Yang asserts itself. Yin reasserts itself.

We return to balance. Perhaps the ancients are correct.

East and West. North and South. Masculine and Feminine. Yin and Yang.

She is not sure what is the style of her narration. She is a student of texts. Secular texts. Sacred texts.

She is a student of civilizations.

These are her musings.