A left-wing poster of about 14 years old (at least mentally) responded to one of my posts. This is how I look at the two words in the title.
The words anonymous and irresponsible go hand in hand. When one is anonymous they are not responsible for their actions and actions are irresponsible. It can be the fourteen year old kid that lives up the street that likes to tear down John McCain signs. This was probably done at the direct action of the Messiah, Nobama, because he is the anointed one and cannot be questioned. Putting up a sign for his opponent violates his right to be elected.
Allow me to respond to him. First I am Ralph Brandt – from York PA. When I write I am responsible for what I write. He is an anonymous and irresponsible writer. I don’t know who he is or what credentials he has. Mine are public record. And he gives us a glimpse of his academic deficiencies in his post. He has an adequate understanding of the spell checker. He does not understand the English language above the level of third grade where they teach the difference between do and due. He also does not under capitalization of the first word of a sentence.
Now with that out of the way, let’s talk about his other intellectual deficiencies. It is one thing to be asked, “Can an ice age occur,” and respond, “I cannot say it couldn’t.” It is another to write a pseudo-scientific paper saying it can to promote one’s career. It is even worse to use it to help prove a fictional concept like man induced global warming to help get it published.
They are both bare faced lies and lies to prove lies.
I NEVER imply that this is to gain access to grant money. I soundly say, “it is.” If this were done in any other venue it would be called FRAUD and the coercion of people to alter scientific papers to support the party line would be called EXTORTION.
Since about October 23 xxx (his initials have been removed so that he is portrayed as what he is, a nobody) has been posting his venom to about 23 of my articles – that has grown to 30 over the weeks. When I delete the lies and garbage he posts it re-appears within about 4-6 hours. He apparently has a lot of free time on his hands to pull up that many articles and post the comment. Probably he is on welfare and we are keeping his sorry butt. My argument on deleting them stems from several things, one is the comments do not have anything to do with the article. These are to be comments. These are personal attacks on me not comments on the article. Second I don’t believe comments are valid to be longer than the original article. If he wants to post his perverted ideas, set up an account and post.He has also posted his trash on other sites if I comment on an article. BTW, most of my comments are positive which singles him and one other anonymous and irresponsible person out.
Welcome to Authspot, the spot for creative writing.
Read some stories and poems, and be sure to subscribe to our feed!