This covers God and Evolution as opposed to God vs Evolution. I will examine theories to the origin of life and coincide them with the belief in God.

Natural Selection

While studying on the Beagle, Darwin came up with his theory of natural selection and evolution. According to Darwin, in order for natural selection to be possible, there needs to be variety within species. Darwin assumes that individuals are inconsistent and that there are variations with each individual. He also has to assume that the history of Earth is very long and that survival and reproduction don’t just happen randomly. Genes can be passed by mutation, copying errors, DNA damage or the rearrangement of genes during reproduction, also called recombination. These are ways genes can change without being naturally selected. If the changes in genes are useful, then that individual will more likely survive and pass on its traits. If these traits are not reproducible, then offspring will not have them. “In the survival of favoured individuals and races, during the constantly-recurring struggle for existence, we see a powerful and ever-acting form of selection.”

Darwin concluded that all individuals vary in many different ways. Darwin knew this, but he didn’t have any idea that those variations were caused by DNA and are also passed down to offspring by DNA. In order to study variations in individuals, Darwin used pigeons. He compared the short faced Tumbler with the English Carrier and pointed out their different beaks and skulls. He compared foot length, skin between toes and the development of their oil glands. He concluded that every type of pigeon that ever lived originated from the Rock Pigeon. He then crossed different species of pigeons and got varying offspring, mongrels (A mongrel is an offspring from two different sub species). He discovered that these mongrels were also able to reproduce and pass on their traits; therefore, evolution of a species is proved to be possible.

Species are naturally selected in competition for food. Darwin used wolves as an example. Theoretically, if one day, for any reason, deer began to die off and become rare, only the fastest and smartest wolves would be able to catch the deer. Darwin goes on to say “this is no different than man picking the fleetness of his greyhounds.” Plants that provide the most nectar would be most often visited by insects and consequently would be most crossed with other plants. These insects would then compete for the nectar produced. Insects with longer proboscises will get insects much easier than those with short ones. Depending on which plants lived in a certain area, the species of insects that can feed on those plants will also live in that area. If the species of plant begins to decline in numbers, then so would the insects that feed on it. If the insects began to decline, the plants would also decline and plants with favorable traits will survive. This happens because the plants depend on the insect to spread its pollen, and the insect depends on the plant for food. Darwin concludes, “Natural selection banishes the belief of the continued creation of new organic beings, or of any great and sudden modification in structure.” Darwin is implying that new species aren’t made by a god, but are created by natural selection.

0
Liked it
Comments (2)
  • marino mangone on Aug 12, 2009

    Yes, that’s the problem with the world, everyone thinks they are right.
    Even all the religions can’t agree 100% yet they all believe in a creator.
    Scientist can’t agree on everything and they use science to prove onto themselves.
    The one thing everyone should be able to agree on is that if all living beings had absolutely none of the five senses sight, hearing, smell, taste and feel (physical and emotional feel) (possibly emotional feel is more connected to the psychic of a being, but non the less still feelings).
    Would everything be just matters of mass?
    As there is no senses to tell you otherwise.
    When will mankind realise that we are all here to help one another progress in this known universe.
    Everyone has something to contribute for progressing mankind no matter how small the imput (some humans would be surprised how some ideas eventuated from and by whom).
    Look at all the different economies around the world, all doing the same thing to get the same result (but they are only concerned about their little box or perhaps their back pocket)?There is a whole wide world (if not universe) out there.
    Is life not about living it to the fullest or finding a balance in everyday life?
    The only certainty (or constant, if your a scientist) in life, is death (as soon as your born you are dying, no matter the timing).
    It would be true to say we cannot have just one leader (as mentioned earlier everyone THINKS they are right) that’s why we have conflict/war in this world and possibly that’s how all the different religions got started?
    But with compromise and working out the issues we can all have have a chance to progress.
    Not all want to do what the another individual does, but you will find groups of individals that do.
    For example we all don’t want to be a doctor, or mechanic, or scientist, or farmer etc.
    But we do need all for mankind progress?
    We all don’t want what the other has/wants (well at least not 24/7), but when it is wanted it should be readily available for everyone and not just the ones with a certain product that has ruined mankind to date (that product being MONEY).
    Mankind has made money the newest of gods, there is a saying money makes the world go around, yet is was spinning before money (now there is something for the scientist to base a theory on).
    There is speculation about the second coming of man?
    Yet if mankind was to all work together as ONE, would this not be the case?
    There are some Nostradamus, so called experts out there that say Nostradamus predicted aliens would come down and impregnate humans to make a super race?
    Yet we have the science now to be able to do this.
    These so called experts also say that Nostradamus predicted the end of the world, they mentioned the earth will be engulfed in darkness, followed by great light (which they translate as being an explosion)
    Look at they way the world economy is heading today, if it keeps going down this path, would we not have to turn off all the lights out around the world?
    Because in today’s society, mankind says money rules, so no money, no productivity (oh my, the world would be engulfed in darkness as we would have to turn off all the power stations)
    Then man would realise, money does not make the world go around.
    So then all the power stations would start back up, and what do know, we have the world lighting up once again (but wait NO explosion), just mankind finally realising we DO need one another to help mankind progress and not money.
    In both Genisis and Evolution you need something or someone to start/make progress anything known to man.
    Anyway who in their right mind would WANT to rule the world 24/7 for the rest of their lives.
    If there is a real god even he/she would not want to rule every day (well it is written, god rested after creating).
    There are many different races on this planet, with many different ideas with the same goal in mind.
    Mentioned earlier life is about balancing what we do in everyday life, even the heartrate when view by electronic means goes up, down.
    Yet when we cease to live the heartrate flatlines (the perfect balance)?
    I could go on more but I THINK that’s enough for now.

  • james on Aug 13, 2009

    Not a bad comment, just have to watch the spelling mistakes.

Leave a Comment

Hi there!

Hello! Welcome to Authspot, the spot for creative writing.
Read some stories and poems, and be sure to subscribe to our feed!

Find the Spot

Loading